2006 PLP 1046 (MLD)
MUHAMMAD MITHAL alias MITHO and 2 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2006 PLP 1046 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD MITHAL alias MITHO and 2 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 1046 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 1046 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 1046 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD MITHAL alias MITHO and 2 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Jai Jai Veshno for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 498
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.337-A(i), H(i), 403, 504, 148 & 149
Interim pre-arrest bail, confirmation of
All sections of P.P.C. applied in F.I.R. were bailable and did not come within the ambit of S.497, Cr.P.C.
Earlier interim pre-arrest bail granted to accused was confirmed on same terms and conditions.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL SOOMRO, J.
By an order dated 5-5-2006, interim pre-arrest bail was granted to applicants above named in Crime F.I.R. No.53 of 2006, registered under sections 337-A(i), F(i), (H)(i), 148, 149, 403, 504, P.P.C. at Police Station Lakhi Ghulam Shah. Today the same is fixed for confirmation or otherwise. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicants have been involved in this false case due to enmity and suspicion. He further submits that all the allegations applied in the F.I.R. are bailable and alleged offence does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. and the offences are not punishable with imprisonment of life, death or 10 years. He lastly submitted that co-accused Eidan has been admitted on bail by trial Court and case has been challaned but the applicants were of no knowledge regarding their involvement in this present case, hence after a raid made by the concerned police at the house of applicants, they came to know and left himself at the mercy of Court, now the applicants/accused wants to appear before the trial Court on or before the date of hearing to face the alleged charge. For what it has been discussed above, I am of the considered view that since all the sections applied in F.I.R, are bailable and does not come within the ambit of section 497, Cr.P.C. Thus the earlier interim pre arrest bail granted to applicants is confirmed on same term and condition. The applicants are directed to appear before the trial Court to face their trial. The Criminal Bail Application No.191 of 2006, in view of above stands disposed of. H.B.T./M-63/K Bail confirmed.