1992 PLP 1651 (MLD)
SAEEDUDDIN NAOVI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL JAVED, A.D.J. and another‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1992 PLP 1651 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Malik Muhammad Qayyum, J |
| Parties | SAEEDUDDIN NAOVI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL JAVED, A.D.J. and another‑‑‑Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP 1651 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP 1651 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Malik Muhammad Qayyum, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP 1651 (MLD) (SAEEDUDDIN NAOVI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL JAVED, A.D.J. and another‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Muhammad Rafique Khan Chauhan for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 3rd February, 1992.
Headnotes / Summary
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) ‑‑‑‑S.24‑‑‑Transfer of suit‑‑‑Petitioner's prayer was that suit pending in Court of Civil Judge be transferred to High Court and tried therein, in exercise of original jurisdiction on ground that one of the defendants in suit was working as Additional District Judge and it would be difficult for Trial Court to decide the matter impartially‑‑‑Ends of justice would be served if suit was withdrawn from the Court of Civil Judge and entrusted to District Judge for its trial in accordance with law.
Judgment & Decree
Muhammad Rafique Khan Chauhan for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 3rd February, 1992. This is an application under section 24 of the C.P.C. seeking transfer of a suit filed by the petitioner against the respondent which is pending in the Court of Mr. Zafar Iqbal, Civil Judge, Lahore. The prayer is that the suit be tried by this Court in the exercise of its, original jurisdiction on the ground that respondent No.1 is working as Additional District Judge, Lahore and it would be difficult for the trial Court to decide the matter impartially.
2. No one has appeared 6n behalf of the respondents to contest this application. I think the ends of justice should be served if the suit is withdrawn from the Court of Civil Judge and is entrusted to the Court of District Judge. Lahore for its trial. As a result of what has been stated above the suit titled "Saeeduddin Naqvi v. Muhammad Afzal Javed and another" is withdrawn from the Court o: Mr. Zafar Iqbal, Civil Judge, Lahore and is entrusted to the Court of District Judge, Lahore for its trial in accordance with law. No order as to costs. AA./S‑90/L Suit transferred