1986 PLP 2413(1) (MLD)
BASHIR AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD HANIF SHAH and 2 others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1986 PLP 2413(1) (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Mazhar‑ul‑Haq, J |
| Parties | BASHIR AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD HANIF SHAH and 2 others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 2413(1) (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 2413(1) (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Mazhar‑ul‑Haq, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 2413(1) (MLD) (BASHIR AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD HANIF SHAH and 2 others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Hussain for Petitioner.
- Zafar Pasha Chaudhary for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 16th April, 1986.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S.497(5)‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302, 364 & 420‑‑Bail, cancellation of‑‑Accused found innocent by Police‑‑Facts and data for holding them innocent not disclosed‑‑Case, held, was not fit for bail and bail allowed to accused was, cancelled in circumstances. S.M. Hamid Ali for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S.497(5)‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302, 364 & 420‑‑Bail, cancellation of‑‑Accused found innocent by Police‑‑Facts and data for holding them innocent not disclosed‑‑Case, held, was not fit for bail and bail allowed to accused was, cancelled in circumstances. Ch. Muhammad Hussain for Petitioner. Zafar Pasha Chaudhary for Respondents. S.M. Hamid Ali for the State. Date of hearing: 16th April, 1986. The respondents are accused in a murder case. Their petition for bail was dismissed on 17‑4‑1985 for the reasons that incriminating articles were recovered at their instance. Later on 3‑9‑1985 Additional Sessions Judge, IV Gujrat, allowed them bail on the ground that they were found innocent by the police, without disclosing the facts and data on which they were found innocent, the bail was allowed to them. It appears that the accused persons were trying to effect a compromise with the complainant which became the basis of the police report. I do not consider it a fit case for bail. The bail allowed to them is cancelled. They shall be taken into custody and sent up for trial. S.A. Bail cancelled.