1976 PLP 60 (SCMR)
GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN - Petitioner Versus Syed YASIN‑Respondent/Applicant
| Citation | 1976 PLP 60 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | ----O. XXVI‑‑‑Review Petition for Leave to Appeal refused by Supreme Court and decree of High Court upheld‑Decree (despite rejection of petition for Special heave to Appeal) not satisfied and decree‑holder therefore making complaint to Supreme Court by way of review petition field: review petition misconceived proper remedy: to approach High Court for implementation of decree. Review . |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN - Petitioner Versus Syed YASIN‑Respondent/Applicant |
| Primary Law | Supreme Court Rules, 1956 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1976 PLP 60 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Supreme Court Rules, 1956 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1976 PLP 60 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the ----O. XXVI‑‑‑Review Petition for Leave to Appeal refused by Supreme Court and decree of High Court upheld‑Decree (despite rejection of petition for Special heave to Appeal) not satisfied and decree‑holder therefore making complaint to Supreme Court by way of review petition field: review petition misconceived proper remedy: to approach High Court for implementation of decree. Review . bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1976 PLP 60 (SCMR) (GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN - Petitioner Versus Syed YASIN‑Respondent/Applicant). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Nemo for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing : 13th August 1975.
Headnotes / Summary
(In the matter of a miscellaneous application can the order of the Court diced 5‑9‑1974).
O. XXVI‑‑‑Review Petition for Leave to Appeal refused by Supreme Court and decree of High Court upheld‑Decree (despite rejection of petition for Special heave to Appeal) not satisfied and decree‑holder therefore making complaint to Supreme Court by way of review petition field: review petition misconceived proper remedy: to approach High Court for implementation of decree. [ Review ]. Applicant in person.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, J.- Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. K‑40 of 1974 was dismissed by the Court on 5‑9-1974. The present petitioner was the respondent in that petition. He seeks directions from the Court that on the basis of the decree Obtained lay him which was upheld by this Court, he is entitled to arrears of salary for 2 years but the Government of Pakistan has failed to reimburse him so far. The proper remedy open to the petitioner it the circumstances, is to apply to the Government or to file a Writ petition in the High Court for implementation of the terms of the decree. The present petition misconceived and in dismissed as such. Petition Dismissed.