1987 P Cr (PLP)
BABAR ALI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1987 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Sharif, J |
| Parties | BABAR ALI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Sharif, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 P Cr (PLP) (BABAR ALI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Moin‑ud‑Din Chaudhary for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S. 12‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Petitioner eleven years of age and according to medical certificate not capable of committing unnatural offence, allowed bail. Tassaduq Hussain Jillani, A.A.‑G. for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S. 12‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Petitioner eleven years of age and according to medical certificate not capable of committing unnatural offence, allowed bail. Moin‑ud‑Din Chaudhary for Petitioner. Tassaduq Hussain Jillani, A.A.‑G. for the State. The petitioner has been arrested under section 12 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance No. VII of 1979. He has petitioned for being released on bail.
2. According to the petition, Muhammad Iqbal son of Nazir Hussain, the complainant, was playing in the lane. Therefrom he was taken away by Babar Ali, the petitioner, in a room where chaff was lying. He committed unnatural offence with Muhammad Iqbal and the matter was reported to the police.
3. It has been contended that the petitioner is 11 years of age and according to the medical certificates, he is not capable of performing this nefarious act. In the circumstances, I allow bail to the petitioner in the sum of Rs.20,000 (Rupees twenty thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the A.C./Duty Magistrate, Chichawatni, till the disposal of the case against him. S.G.D./B‑14/L Bail allowed.