1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
GHULAM HUSSAIN WAHLA Versus DIRECTOR EDUCATION (COLLEGES), BAHAWALPUR
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Service Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Aslam Pirzada, Chairman and Abdul Hamid Khan, Member |
| Parties | GHULAM HUSSAIN WAHLA Versus DIRECTOR EDUCATION (COLLEGES), BAHAWALPUR |
| Primary Law | Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Muhammad Aslam Pirzada, Chairman and Abdul Hamid Khan, Member.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (GHULAM HUSSAIN WAHLA Versus DIRECTOR EDUCATION (COLLEGES), BAHAWALPUR). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M.A: Riaz for Appellant.
- A.G. Humayun, District Attorney for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 7th August, 1990.
Headnotes / Summary
Reporting Officer himself had expressed his inability to justify adverse remarks against civil servant
Civil servant, who was an Assistant Professor of a Government College, had been successful both in developmental and curricular activities of institution with cooperation of his colleagues and had also been trying his level best to improve results of the college
Civil servant had earned satisfactory reports and adverse remarks for the years 1982 and 1983 had been conveyed to him at the end of year 1985 in violation of instructions regarding writing of A.C.Rs
Nothing was against civil servant except that some members of staff did not remain on good terms with him
Remarks of reporting officer against civil servant which were totally misconceived and not justified, were liable to be expunged
Judgment & Decree
DIVISION, BAHAWALPUR and another Appeal No. 6/904 of 1987, decided on 18th August, 1990.
Reporting Officer himself had expressed his inability to justify adverse remarks against civil servant
Civil servant, who was an Assistant Professor of a Government College, had been successful both in developmental and curricular activities of institution with cooperation of his colleagues and had also been trying his level best to improve results of the college
Civil servant had earned satisfactory reports and adverse remarks for the years 1982 and 1983 had been conveyed to him at the end of year 1985 in violation of instructions regarding writing of A.C.Rs
Nothing was against civil servant except that some members of staff did not remain on good terms with him
Remarks of reporting officer against civil servant which were totally misconceived and not justified, were liable to be expunged M.A: Riaz for Appellant. A.G. Humayun, District Attorney for Respondents. Date of hearing: 7th August, 1990.