YLR 2007

2007 PLP 216 (YLR)

HABIBULLAH alias HABIB — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
Criminal Bail Application No.S-131 of 2006, decided on 26th May, 2006.
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Mujeebullah Siddiqui, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2007 PLP 216 (YLR)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members Muhammad Mujeebullah Siddiqui, J
Parties HABIBULLAH alias HABIB — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 216 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 216 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Muhammad Mujeebullah Siddiqui, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 216 (YLR) (HABIBULLAH alias HABIB — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497

Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, (VI of 1979), S.17(3)

Bail, grant of-State counsel had conceded the grant of bail on the ground that enmity existed between the parties over piece of land and that allegations against accused were of general nature and no specific role was attributed to accused

Accused, was admitted to bail, in circumstances. Muhammad Saleem and G.N. Jesar for Applicant. Muhammad Ismail Bhutto for the State.

Judgment & Decree

MUHAMMAD MUJEEBULLAH SIDDIQUI, J.

The applicant is facing trial for the commission of offence under section 17(3), Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 along with nine other persons.

2. The learned State counsel has conceded for the bail on the ground that there is admitted enmity between the parties over a piece of land and there are allegations of general' nature, no specific role is attributed to the applicant.

3. In the above circumstances bail is granted to the applicant in the sum of Rs.50,000 and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. H.B,T./H-21/K Bail granted.