2010 PLP 2505 (YLR)
ABDUL SATTAR — Petitioner Versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI through its Executive District Officer — Respondent
| Citation | 2010 PLP 2505 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Mushir Alam and Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, JJ |
| Parties | ABDUL SATTAR — Petitioner Versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI through its Executive District Officer — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 PLP 2505 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 PLP 2505 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Mushir Alam and Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 PLP 2505 (YLR) (ABDUL SATTAR — Petitioner Versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI through its Executive District Officer — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 199
Constitutional petition
Compensation of deficit land
Claim for--Petitioner had impugned the action of the authorities claiming compensation of deficit land, which had been re-numbered in the scheme
Petitioner applied for development of the scheme and authorities had approved the development scheme and they, in fact constructed and developed roads of the petitioner's area
Counsel for the authorities had stated that such was for the benefit and purpose of the Society and not for any other purpose and that the area random had been affected in town planning
If such town planning was carried out, there would be serious problem between different juncture of lands and none was prepared to leave an inch for public utility purpose
For developing scheme, a particular percentage of property was required for utility and amenity purpose and such area used for the construction of the road was far less than the required percentage of the land
Petitioner and the counsel for authorities being not in attendance petition was disposed of. Manzoor Ahmed for C.D.G.K. Miran Muhammad Shah, A.A.-G.
Judgment & Decree
MUSHIR ALAM, J.
Petitioner has impugned the action of the respondent claiming compensation, of deficit land-measuring 3-24 acres in Survey No.570, Deh Gujro District Karachi East, which has been re-numbered as plot No. 7, Sector 1-A/1 Scheme
33. It appears that since the petitioner applied for development of the scheme and the respondents have approved the development scheme and they, in fact, constructed and developed roads all around the petitioner area, which consumed 3.24 acres out of area 32.28 acres. Mr. Manzoor states that such is for the benefit and purpose of the society and not for any other purpose. According to him, the area random has been affected in town planning. In case such town planning are carried out there will be serious problem between different juncture of lands, each other and none of the person is prepared to leave an inch for public utility purpose. Mr. Manzoor states that for developing Scheme it is also mandatorily required particular-percentage for utility and amenity purpose and such area used for the construction of the road is far less than the required percentage of the land. Apparently for this reason petitioner and the counsel are not in attendance. Report is taken on record. Petition stand disposed of along with all pending applications. H.B.T./A-50/K Order accordingly.