1981 PLP 1245 (CLC)
The JETPUR MEMON ASSOCIATION‑Petitioner Versus Mst. ZUBEDA BEGUM AND 9 others‑Respondents
| Citation | 1981 PLP 1245 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | The JETPUR MEMON ASSOCIATION‑Petitioner Versus Mst. ZUBEDA BEGUM AND 9 others‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑, (a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 1245 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑, (a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 1245 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 1245 (CLC) (The JETPUR MEMON ASSOCIATION‑Petitioner Versus Mst. ZUBEDA BEGUM AND 9 others‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ikram Ahmed Ansari for Respondents Nos. 1 and 9.
- S. M. Muslim Naqvi for Respondent No. 10.
Headnotes / Summary
O. I, r. 10(2)‑Addition of parties to suit‑Petitioner applying to be joined as party in second suit filed by predecessor‑in‑interest of occupants of plot allotted to petitioner‑Petitioner not filing suit for possession of plot in spite of prior suit having been decided in favour of predecessor‑in‑interest of and occupants of plot‑Held, such circum. stance would not bar petitioner from being joined as party and Court has only to see party interested in subject‑matter of suit or likely to be prejudiced by its result.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑ O. I, r. 10(2)‑Addition of parties to suit‑Predecessor‑in‑interest of respondents occupants of plot filing suit for declaration and injunction to restrain Municipal Corporation from forcible removal or demolotion of his structure‑Suit decreed, mainly on ground of invalidity of notice by Corporation and right of predecessor -in‑interest of occupants of plot not determined ‑ Predecessor‑in -interest of occupants of plot filing second suit challenging validity of Corporation's contemplated action‑Held, decision of suit bound to affect interest of allottee of plot (petitioner) and in case of suit being decreed, unautborised construction on plot would continue to stand and such result prejudicially affecting petitioner, petitioner held, necessary party to suit. Haji Abdul Wahab v. Karachi Municipal Corporation P L D 1956 Kar. 391 ref. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑
O. I, r. 10(2)‑Addition of parties to suit‑Petitioner applying to be joined as party in second suit filed by predecessor‑in‑interest of occupants of plot allotted to petitioner‑Petitioner not filing suit for possession of plot in spite of prior suit having been decided in favour of predecessor‑in‑interest of and occupants of plot‑Held, such circum. stance would not bar petitioner from being joined as party and Court has only to see party interested in subject‑matter of suit or likely to be prejudiced by its result. Jan Muhammad Dawood for Applicant. Ikram Ahmed Ansari for Respondents Nos. 1 and
9. S. M. Muslim Naqvi for Respondent No.