2002 PLP 1708 (CLD)
ABDUL SATTAR‑‑‑Appellant Versus HABIB BANK LIMITED and another‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 2002 PLP 1708 (CLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Jawwad S. Khawaja and Abdul Shakoor Paracha, JJ |
| Parties | ABDUL SATTAR‑‑‑Appellant Versus HABIB BANK LIMITED and another‑‑‑Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2002 PLP 1708 (CLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2002 PLP 1708 (CLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Jawwad S. Khawaja and Abdul Shakoor Paracha, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2002 PLP 1708 (CLD) (ABDUL SATTAR‑‑‑Appellant Versus HABIB BANK LIMITED and another‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Malik Naeemullah Khan for Appellant.
- Nemo for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑Ss. 17 & 22‑‑‑Decree for .recovery of money‑‑‑Relief claimed in appeal was that appellant wanted to make payment of decretal debt, in instalments ‑‑‑Validity‑‑ Appellant after passing of decree ‑had not paid any amount to respondent‑Bank in satisfaction thereof‑‑‑No equity was in favour of appellant, thus, he was not entitled to any relief or indulgence‑‑‑High Court dismissed the appeal in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
The only ground on which notice was issued to the respondent‑Bank was that the appellant had wanted to make payment of the decretal debt in instalments. We have asked learned counsel to show if any amount at all has been paid to the respondent‑Bank after the passing of the impugned decree on 7‑3‑2002. He states that no amount whatsoever has been paid in satisfaction of the said decree.
2. In these circumstances, we do not find any equity in favour of the appellant. He, therefore, is not entitled to any relief or indulgence. This appeal as consequence is dismissed. S.A.K./A‑542/L Appeal dismissed.