1999 PLP 3445 (MLD)
ATTA ULLAH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1999 PLP 3445 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ATTA ULLAH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1999 PLP 3445 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1999 PLP 3445 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1999 PLP 3445 (MLD) (ATTA ULLAH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Mian Fazal Rauf Joya for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 324/34
Allegation against accused was that he fired pistol which hit at thigh of complainant, but later on co-accused had made statement under S. 164, Cr. P.C. that none had accompanied him at the time of occurrence and that it was he who had fired with pistol and that incident took place due to filthy language used by complainant--Statement of co-accused under 5.164, Cr.P.C., had made case agar accused that of further inquiry
Judgment & Decree
Mian Fazal Rauf Joya for Petitioner. Khadim Nadeem Malik, Addl. A. G The petitioner is involved in a case under section 324/34, P. P. C, vide F. I. R. No. 118 of 1998 dated 29-3-1998 registered at Police Station Cilty Arifwala, District Pakpattan Sharif.
2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he fired with a 30 bore pistol which hit at the thigh of the complainant but later on the co-accused Jai td alias Jeda has made statement under section 164, Cr.P.C that none accompanied with him at the time of occurrence and that it was he who had fire; with the said pistol and that the incident took place due to the filthy language used by the complainant.
3. The bail is opposed on the ground that the petitioner is specially named in the F. I. R. and specific role is attributed to him and the proper course is to move bail in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Arifwala.
4. I have given due consideration to the valuable arguments on both sides. The statement of the co-accused under section 164, Cr.P.C. has made this that of further inquiry, as such, bail is granted in the sum Rs. 10,000 with on' surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court. H.B.T./A-282/L Bail granted.