1983 SCMR724 (PLP)
MRS. ALIMA AHMAD-Appellant Versus AMIR ALI-Respondent
| Citation | 1983 SCMR724 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MRS. ALIMA AHMAD-Appellant Versus AMIR ALI-Respondent |
| Primary Law | Supreme Court Rules, 1980 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1983 SCMR724 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Supreme Court Rules, 1980 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1983 SCMR724 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1983 SCMR724 (PLP) (MRS. ALIMA AHMAD-Appellant Versus AMIR ALI-Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Akhtar Mahmud. Advocate- un-Record for Appellant.
- Shafiq Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent,
- Date of hearing : 28th March, 1982,
- Akhtar Mahmud. Advocate‑ un‑Record for Appellant.
- Shafiq Ahmed, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent,
Headnotes / Summary
O. XI-West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), S. 13(2)(i)-Terms of tenancy agreement between landlord and tenant-Whether continue to remain in force in spite of termination of agreement-Conflict of views of Supreme Court on question-Larger Bench-Authoritative pronouncement by-Special Leave to Appeal granted. to resolve conflict of views between two Benches of Supreme Court-One view given by Bench of four Judges-Bench of three Judges hearing appeal-Held, authoritative pronouncement by larger Bench desired. Muhammad Yousuf v. Abdullah P L D 1980 S C 298 and Alif Din v. Khadim Hussain 1980 S C M R 767 ref.
Judgment & Decree
Akhtar Mahmud. Advocate‑ un‑Record for Appellant. Shafiq Ahmed, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent, Date of hearing : 28th March, 1982, ABDUL QADIR SHAIKH, J.‑Special Leave to Appeal was granted in this case in order to resolve the conflict of view between the Benches of this Court in "Muhammad Yousuf v. Abdullah (P L D 1980 S C 298) and "Alif Din v. Khadim) Hussain (1980 S C M R 767) on the question whether all the terms of tenancy agreement bet ween a landlord and tenant continue to remain in force in spite of termina tion of that agreement by efflux of time. Learned counsel for the parties rightly point out that since the decision of this Court in "Muhammad Yusuf v. Abduliah" was given by the Bench consisting of four Judges, it is only appropriate that the authoritative pro nouncement should be rendered by a larger Bench. The hearing of this case is, therefore, adjourned so that it may be heard by a larger Bench. The file of the case shall be placed before the Hon'ble Chief Justice for such orders as he may deem fit and proper. Order accordingly.