2006 PLP 2177 (YLR)
MUHAMMAD AKRAM SHEHZAD and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent.
| Citation | 2006 PLP 2177 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Farrukh Mahmud, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD AKRAM SHEHZAD and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent. |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 2177 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 2177 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Farrukh Mahmud, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 2177 (YLR) (MUHAMMAD AKRAM SHEHZAD and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent.). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Mohandra for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Arts. 3 & 4
Provisions of S.103, Cr.P.C. had been violated with impunity by complainant/A. S. -1.
Offences against accused did not attract prohibitory clause of S. 497, Cr.P.C.-Nothing was on record to show that accused previously was involved in any criminal case
Accused was admitted to bail, in circumstances. M.A. Farazi for the State with Ghulam Farid, A.S.-I. Dr. Mansoor Tariq, M.O., District Jail Hospital, Rahimyar Khan in Person.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD FARRUKH MAHMUD, J.
After going through the original record, I am not inclined to proceed further against Dr. Mansoor Tariq.
2. Muhammad Akram Shahzad and Muhammad Usman have sought post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No. 99 registered at Police Station City, Khanpur on 14-3-2005 for offences under Articles 3/4 of the Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order, 1979.
3. As per F.I.R., on secret information, the petitioners were apprehended by Hafeez Ahmad, A.S.-I./ complainant. During search, 300 Kuppis (small containers) of liquor were recovered from the possession of the petitioners and the case was registered against them.
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have also gone through the relevant record of the case.
5. It has been noticed that the provisions of section 103, Cr.P.C. have been violated with impunity by the complainant/A.S.-I; that the offences do not attract the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. and that no record is available against the petitioners that they were not previously involved in any criminal case. In the circumstances, I am inclined to admit the petitioners to bail subject to their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of rupees fifty thousand each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. H.B.T./M-255/L????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Bail granted.