1987 PLP 673 (PLC)
Major (Rtd.) RIASAT ALI Versus FAUJI FERTILIZERS and others
| Citation | 1987 PLP 673 (PLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore High Court |
| Bench Members | Abdul Shakurul Salam, J |
| Parties | Major (Rtd.) RIASAT ALI Versus FAUJI FERTILIZERS and others |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 673 (PLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 673 (PLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore High Court bench comprising: Abdul Shakurul Salam, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 673 (PLC) (Major (Rtd.) RIASAT ALI Versus FAUJI FERTILIZERS and others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Rao Hamid Mukhtar Khan for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968)‑‑ ‑‑‑S.O.12‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑‑Termination of contractual service‑‑Services of worker terminated in terms of contract itself‑‑Interference declined in constitutional jurisdiction.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S.O.12‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑‑Termination of contractual service‑‑Services of worker terminated in terms of contract itself‑‑Interference declined in constitutional jurisdiction. Rao Hamid Mukhtar Khan for Petitioner. The petitioner's services have been: terminated by the competent authority vide order dated 12‑2‑1987. Hence, this petition.
2. Clause 13(c) of the terms and conditions of service provides as follows. "Normal service tenure would extend upto superannuation age subject to the condition that either party may terminate the service by one month's notice at any time." The order of termination of service is that "your services are no longer required by the Fauji Fertilizer Company Limited. Your services are, therefore, terminated with immediate effect. You will be paid one month's salary in lieu of notice period."
3. From the above it is obvious that contractual service has bee terminated in terms of the contract itself. No question of invocation of Constitutional jurisdiction arises. This petition is, therefore dismissed. M.Y.H./R‑27/L Petition dismissed.