CLD 2005

2005 PLP 1739 (CLD)

Messrs SHAHID IMRAN, LEATHER INDUSTRY and 3 others — Appellants Versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN through Vice-President and General Attorney — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
2004-April-21
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2005 PLP 1739 (CLD)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties Messrs SHAHID IMRAN, LEATHER INDUSTRY and 3 others — Appellants Versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN through Vice-President and General Attorney — Respondent
Primary Law Financial Institution (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2005 PLP 1739 (CLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Financial Institution (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2005 PLP 1739 (CLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2005 PLP 1739 (CLD) (Messrs SHAHID IMRAN, LEATHER INDUSTRY and 3 others — Appellants Versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN through Vice-President and General Attorney — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Financial Institution (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001)

Representation

  • Abid Farooq for Petitioner/Appellant.
  • Abid Hussain for Respondent.

Headnotes / Summary

Ss. 9 & 22

Suit for recovery of loan

Compromise between parties

Counsel for parties had stated that an agreement had been arrived at between parties and said agreement had been filed before Executing Court which had been partly acted upon and would be fully implemented in terms stated therein

Appeal was disposed of in terms of said agreement.

Judgment & Decree

C.M. No.407 of 2002 Both the learned counsel state that the parties have arrived at an agreement for the payment of decretal amount. This C.M. is accordingly allowed and R.F.A. is restored to its original number. The main R.F.A. to be taken up. Main R.F.A. No.460 of 1999 Presence as above.

2. Learned counsel for the parties state that an agreement has been arrived at between the parties, copy whereof is Mark "A'. According to the learned counsel for the parties this agreement has been filed before the learned Executing Court and has been partly acted upon and shall be impleadment in terms stated in the Mark "A". This R.F.A. is accordingly disposed of in terms of the said agreement Mark "A". No orders as to costs. H.B.T./S-117/L Order accordingly.