2015 PLP 152 (GBLR)
SHABBIR HUSSAIN and 29 others — Petitioners Versus SAJJAD SALEEM HOTIYANA and 5 others — Respondents
| Citation | 2015 PLP 152 (GBLR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Appellate Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | SHABBIR HUSSAIN and 29 others — Petitioners Versus SAJJAD SALEEM HOTIYANA and 5 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance) Order, 2009 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2015 PLP 152 (GBLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance) Order, 2009 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2015 PLP 152 (GBLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Appellate Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2015 PLP 152 (GBLR) (SHABBIR HUSSAIN and 29 others — Petitioners Versus SAJJAD SALEEM HOTIYANA and 5 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Rehmat Ali, Advocate for Petitioners.
- Advocate-General, Gilgit-Baltistan for Respondents.
- RAJA JALAL-UD-DIN, J.---On 14/05/2014 the Secretary Fishries Department Mr. Kamal Khan was directed to look into the matter of petitioners with the assistance of Advocate General Gilgit-Baltistan and Mr. Rehmat Ali counsel for the petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
Arts. 75 & 61
Application for initiating contempt proceedings against the then Secretary Agriculture, Live Stock and Fisheries and the Director Fisheries for non-compliance with directions of the Supreme Appellate Court regarding regularization of services of petitioners
Present Secretary Fisheries Department informed the court that the petitioners had been adjusted and were given appointments in compliance with the directions of the Supreme Appellate Court
Supreme Appellate Court observed that compliance had been made with its directions and the petitioners had duly been compensated by being appointed or by regular footing
Contempt proceedings were no longer required in such circumstances
Suo motu case along with application for initiating contempt proceedings was disposed of accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
RAJA JALAL-UD-DIN, J.
On 14/05/2014 the Secretary Fishries Department Mr. Kamal Khan was directed to look into the matter of petitioners with the assistance of Advocate General Gilgit-Baltistan and Mr. Rehmat Ali counsel for the petitioners. Today the Secretary Fisheries Department Gilgit-Baltistan namely Kamal Khan informed the Court that the petitioners had been adjusted and the proceedings of Contempt of Court were no longer required. The counsel for the petitioners was confronted who admitted that the petitioners had been given appointments and the order of this August Court was complied with. The counsel for the petitioners was of the view that their regular employment should have been from the date of order of this Apex Court i.e. 04-05-2011. We feel that the respondents have complied with the orders of this Court without going into the merits and demerits of the case. We feel that the petitioners have duly been compensated by being appointed or regular footing. The petition is disposed off accordingly. MWA/159/GB Order accordingly.