1984 PLP 1318 (MLD)
MUHAMMAD AFZAL — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1984 PLP 1318 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Kamal Mustafa Bokhari, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD AFZAL — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 PLP 1318 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 PLP 1318 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Kamal Mustafa Bokhari, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 PLP 1318 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD AFZAL — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Bashir Khan for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 24th October, 1983.
Headnotes / Summary
S 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302--Bail, grant of--Petitioner also suffering one grievous injury by fire-arm and question as to which party was aggressor yet to be determined by trial Court--Held: A case of further inquiry in circumstances--Petitioners allowed bail. Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1295/B of 1983, decided on 24th October, 1983.
S 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302--Bail, grant of--Petitioner also suffering one grievous injury by fire-arm and question as to which party was aggressor yet to be determined by trial Court--Held: A case of further inquiry in circumstances--Petitioners allowed bail. Muhammad Bashir Khan for Petitioner. Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for the State. Date of hearing: 24th October, 1983. Petitioner alongwith one other is accused of offence under section 302/34, P.P.C. Petitioner passed through the lane of the complainant party to which objection was taken. Complainant, who was accompanied by the deceased followed the petitioner when 'the petitioner opened fire killing the deceased in the adjacent lane. It was stated in the F.I.R. that Muhammad Ramzan P.W. caused brick-bat injury to Muhammad Afzal petitioner. According to the medical evidence petitioner was examined on the very day on which F.I.R. was registered and the medico-legal report discloses that the petitioner had suffered one grievous injury by fire-arm. In the circumstances the case against petitioner is of further inquiry. It will be for the trial Court to determine as to who was the aggressor. Therefore, I order release of the petitioner on bail subject to his furnishing security in the sum of Rs. 25,000 (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner/ Duty Magistrate Multan. S . G . D . Bail allowed.