1993 PLP 1364 (SCMR)
AMJAD ALI SHAMI, ELECTRONIC ENGINEER‑‑‑Appellant Versus DIRECTOR, REGIONAL METEOROLOGICAL CENTRE, LAHORE and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1993 PLP 1364 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Saad Saood Jan, Abdul Shakurul Salam and Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, JJ |
| Parties | AMJAD ALI SHAMI, ELECTRONIC ENGINEER‑‑‑Appellant Versus DIRECTOR, REGIONAL METEOROLOGICAL CENTRE, LAHORE and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1993 PLP 1364 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1993 PLP 1364 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Saad Saood Jan, Abdul Shakurul Salam and Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1993 PLP 1364 (SCMR) (AMJAD ALI SHAMI, ELECTRONIC ENGINEER‑‑‑Appellant Versus DIRECTOR, REGIONAL METEOROLOGICAL CENTRE, LAHORE and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Ch. Mazharul Haq, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Appellant.
- Ch. Muhammad Farooq, DA.‑G. instructed by Ch. Muhammad Aslam Chatta, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 22nd April, 1992.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment dated 6‑8‑1989 of the Federal Service Tribunal passed in Appeal No.250 (L)/85). Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑Art. 212‑‑‑Civil service‑‑‑Adverse remarks ‑‑‑Expunction of‑‑‑Civil servant claimed that impression of his being non‑cooperative was based on a single incident when he as a member of three‑man Selection Committee had disagreed with the Chairman‑‑‑Perusal of entire service record of civil servant and case made out by him would justify expunction of adverse remarks against him‑‑‑Adverse remarks were expunged in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
ABDUL SHAKURUL SALAM, J.‑‑‑This appeal by leave arises in the following circumstances.
1. The appellant was working' as an Electronic Engineer (B‑17) in the Regional Meteorological Centre at Lahore. Adverse remarks were conveyed to him. He made a representation that the impression of his being uncooperative was based on a single incident where he is a member of three‑man Selection Committee had disagreed with the Chairman. Having had no relief he filed an appeal before the Federal Service Tribunal which was dismissed . on 6‑8 1989.
2. The appellant was granted leave to appeal vide order dated 14‑3‑1990.
3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and perusing the entire service record of the appellant produced by the learned counsel for the respondents, we are of the view that the remarks deserved to be expunged. Allowing the appeal we order accordingly. Parties are left to bear their own costs. AA./A‑1006/S Appeal accepted.