2007 PLP 2720 (YLR)
SHERAZ QAMAR alias TIPU — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondents
| Citation | 2007 PLP 2720 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Khawaja Muhammad Sharif, J |
| Parties | SHERAZ QAMAR alias TIPU — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 2720 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 2720 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Khawaja Muhammad Sharif, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 2720 (YLR) (SHERAZ QAMAR alias TIPU — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M.A. Zafar for Petitioner.
- Mr. M.A Zafar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naseem Sabir, Advocate for the State. Farid Ahmad S.I with record.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497(2)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302
F.I.R. revealed that accused who was present at the spot, caugh hold of deceased and later on two co-accused also caught hold of deceased and other co-accused caused single injury on the person of . deceased
Seven accused were named in F.I.R.
Accused along with other co-accused, had been placed in the ,Column No.2 of the challan
No injury 'was attributed to accused
Case of accused being of further inquiry, he was admitted to bail. Naseem Sabir for the State. Farid Ahmad, S.I. with record.
Judgment & Decree
Mr. M.A Zafar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naseem Sabir, Advocate for the State. Farid Ahmad S.I with record. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that allegation against the petitioner is that he along with his co-accused caught hold the deceased and gave him fist blow while co-accused Shahid alias Shedi fired a shot with pistol which hit the deceased on his neck; that no .recovery has been effected from the petitioner; that he was placed in Column No.2 of the challan; that there is only one injury on the deceased persons; that case of the petitioner is of further inquiry.
2. Learned State counsel submits that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. but he has .been found innocent by the police and he has been placed in Column No.2 of the challan.
3. I have heard learned counsel four the parties. I have gone through F.I.R., report under section 173, Cr.P.C., and submission of the parties and impugned order. According to the F.I.R. petitioner was present at the spot. He caught hold of the deceased and later on Imran and Umar also caught hold the deceased and Shahid alias Shedi co-accused caused single injury on the person of deceased. Seven accused are named in the F.I.R. Petitioner along with two other accused namely Muhammad Shahid and Shahid alias Shedi have been placed in Column No.2 of the challan. In fact no injury is attributed to the petitioner. Case of the petitioner is of further inquiry. This petition is accepted and the petitioner shall be released on bail if he furnishes bail bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000 with two sureties in the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court. H.B.T./5-116/L??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Bail granted.