1976 PLP 96 (PLC)
ALLIED TEXTILE MILLS' LABOUR UNION Versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS AND ANOTHER
| Citation | 1976 PLP 96 (PLC) |
| Forum / Court | Labour Appellate Tribunal Sind |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ALLIED TEXTILE MILLS' LABOUR UNION Versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS AND ANOTHER |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1976 PLP 96 (PLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1976 PLP 96 (PLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Labour Appellate Tribunal Sind bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1976 PLP 96 (PLC) (ALLIED TEXTILE MILLS' LABOUR UNION Versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS AND ANOTHER). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Muhammad Ayu5 Hussain for Respondent.
Judgment & Decree
S. 10
Cancellation of registration-Labour Court cannot cancel registration but can issue direction for same. Wasiullah Qureshi for Appellant. Muhammad Ayu5 Hussain for Respondent. Date of hearing: 24th December 1975. This appeal has been filed under section 11 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance against the order of the Labour Court cancelling the registration of the Union.
2. The Union had violated the provisions of section 21, I. R. O. of 1969 read with Rule 10 of the Industrial Relations (Sind) Rules, 1973 for the non -submission of the return on the prescribed form for the year 1974.
3. The Registrar had made a complaint to the Labour Court on account of the aforesaid violation. The Labour Court after recording evidence found that the allegations had been established and, therefore, proceeded to cancel the registration of the Union. Aggrieved by this, the present appeal had been filed.
4. The only ground pleaded before me on behalf of the Union is that the Labour Court could not cancel the registration but simply issue a direction for the cancellation of the registration as required by section 10 of I R.O. This position was also conceded by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent. I also find considerable force in this contention.
5. In result I modify the order of the Labour Court and direct that the registration of the Union be cancelled by the Registrar of Trade Unions. With this modification the appeal stands dismissed.