2001 PLP 338 (YLR)
BHAMBHO and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2001 PLP 338 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Wahid Bux Brohi, J |
| Parties | BHAMBHO and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 PLP 338 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 PLP 338 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Wahid Bux Brohi, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 PLP 338 (YLR) (BHAMBHO and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Learned Assistant Advocate-General is of the view that the present applicants have caused injuries to a lady Mst. Sharma.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.337, 337-A(i) & 337-L (ii)
Cross-cases had been registered for the same incident
Offence against the accused did not fall within the prohibitory clause of S. 497, Cr. P. C.
Accused were in custody for a period of more than two months
Accused were granted bail in circumstances. Abdul Rasool Abbassi for Applicants. Ali Azhar Tunio, Asstt. A.-G. for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Abdul Rasool Abbassi for Applicants. Ali Azhar Tunio, Asstt. A.-G. for the State.
1. Granted subject, however, to all just exceptions.
2. Applicants Bhambho and Kaleemullah have sought bail in a case registered as Crime No.6 of 2001 at Police Station Drigh Bala for an offence under sections 334, 337-A(i) and 337-L(ii), P.P.C. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that complainant Muhammad Ayoob and his family members including. his wife and Mst. Sharma wife of Hafiz Saleem were present at their Well when accused Rajab, Bhambho and Kaleemullah left their cattle in their crop on which the complainant party objected whereafter Rajab gave a blow on the head of complainant with blunt side of hatchet while others gave blows to ladies. There is a counter F.I.R. of the same incident registered as Crime No.7 of 2001 wherein accused Rajab is the complainant and the F.I.R. shows five injuries to have been caused to the complainant. Learned counsel for applicants submitted that allegations are general in nature and the offence does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. Learned Assistant Advocate-General is of the view that the present applicants have caused injuries to a lady Mst. Sharma. It could not be denied that cross cases have been registered for the same incident. Moreover, the offence also do not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. and applicants are in custody for a period of more than two months. In the circumstances the application is allowed. Applicants be released on furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand) each and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. H.B.T./B-28/K Bail granted.