2003 PLP 3044 (YLR)
WAQAR AHMAD and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 2003 PLP 3044 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | M. Javed Buttar, J |
| Parties | WAQAR AHMAD and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2003 PLP 3044 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2003 PLP 3044 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: M. Javed Buttar, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2003 PLP 3044 (YLR) (WAQAR AHMAD and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sanaullah Zahid for petitioners.
- Date of hearing:27th June, 2001.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 498‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.364/109‑‑‑pre‑arrest bail, grant of‑‑ Grown up woman was found missing from the house of accused and it was alleged by the complainant that she had been done away by the accused with connivance of another person‑‑Accused had failed to satisfactorily explain the whereabouts of alleged abductee‑‑‑Allegation against accused being serious heinous and no material being available on record to justify grant of pre arrest bail to accused, he was refused bail,
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑S. 498‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.364/109‑‑‑pre‑arrest bail, grant of‑‑ Grown up woman was found missing from the house of accused and it was alleged by the complainant that she had been done away by the accused with connivance of another person‑‑Accused had failed to satisfactorily explain the whereabouts of alleged abductee‑‑‑Allegation against accused being serious heinous and no material being available on record to justify grant of pre arrest bail to accused, he was refused bail, Sanaullah Zahid for petitioners. Date of hearing:27th June, 2001. The petitioners, Waqar Ahmed Malik and Mst. Kausar Parveen, are seeking pre-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No. 339, dated 23-6-2001, registered at Police Station Sadiqabad, District Rawalpindi, for the offence under sections 364/109, P.P.C. at the instance of Muhammad Basharar Mahmood the brother of the abductee Mst. Rakhshanda Waqar, and the wife of petitioner No. 1 for an occurrence which is alleged to have taken place on 1‑6‑2001, when abductee, the wife of the petitioner No.1 became missing from the house of petitioner No. 1.
2. The petitioner s application for the grant of pre‑arrest bail has been dismissed in limine by the Sessions Judge, Rawalpindi on 25‑6‑2001.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the case against the petitioners is false the alleged abductee was divorced by petitioner No.1 on 19-6-2001 and she went missing, on her own, from 20-6-2001 by leaving the house of petitioner No.1 and he does not know her whereabouts and the petitioners have been involved falsely by the in‑laws of petitioner No.1 because he has divorced his former wife and petitioner No.2 has been falsely involved because the petitioner No.1 contracted marriage with her against the wishes of his former wife.
4. A grown‑up woman is missing from the house of petitioner No.1 it is alleged by the complainant that she has been done away by the petitioners with the connivance of one author. The petitioners have failed to satisfactorily explain the whereabouts of the abductee. It is a very serious allegation of the commission of a heinous offence and so far there is no material available on the record to justify the grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners. Dismissed in limine. H.B.T/W-84/L Application bail dismissed.