Register
PCRLJ 1986

1986 P Cr (PLP)

ABDUL RAZAQ alias ALLAH DITTA‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1109/AB of 1985, decided on 29th October, 1985.
Honorable Judges
Qurban Sadiq Ikram, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1986 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Qurban Sadiq Ikram, J
Parties ABDUL RAZAQ alias ALLAH DITTA‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Qurban Sadiq Ikram, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 P Cr (PLP) (ABDUL RAZAQ alias ALLAH DITTA‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • M.R. Khalid Malik for Petitioner.
  • Date of hearing: 29th October, 1985.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S. 12‑‑Bail‑‑Report of Chemical Examiner in negative Medico legal certificate of victim not showing any mark of violence on his person‑‑Bail allowed. Assistant Advocate‑General for the State.

Judgment & Decree

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1109/AB of 1985, decided on 29th October, 1985. ‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S. 12‑‑Bail‑‑Report of Chemical Examiner in negative Medico legal certificate of victim not showing any mark of violence on his person‑‑Bail allowed. M.R. Khalid Malik for Petitioner. Assistant Advocate‑General for the State. Date of hearing: 29th October, 1985. This is a petition for bail on behalf of Abdul Razzaq alias Allah Ditta who is charged under section 12, Ordinance VII of 1979 for committing sodomy on Abdul Sattar P.W.I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.A.‑G. There is delay of 24 hours in lodging of the F.I.R. The report of the Chemical Examiner is negative. The medico‑legal certificate of Abdul Sattar does not show any mark of violence on his person. The petitioner is, therefore, admitted to bail on his furnishing of bail bond in the sum of Rs.5,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C./Duty Magistrate Lodhran. M.Y.H. Bail granted

Legal Tools

Metadata Directory

  • Journal: PCRLJ
  • Volume Year: 1986
  • Citation Ref: 1986 P Cr (PLP)

Cite & Link (Backlink Generator)

Are you writing a blog or referencing this case? Copy the optimized HTML link below to cite this judgment on your website and create a legal backlink:

HTML Backlink Code:
Text Citation:

Related Judgments

  • 1986 P Cr THE STATE‑‑Applicant Versus Rank FAZAL QADEER‑‑Respondent
  • 1986 P Cr THE STATE‑‑Complainant Versus KHAN MUHAMMAD‑‑Accused
  • 1986 P Cr THE STATE Applicant Versus GHULAM RABBANI and others‑‑Respondents
  • 1986 P Cr THE STATE‑‑Complainant Versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE and 3 others‑‑Respondents
  • 1986 P Cr THE STATE‑‑Complainant Versus ILAM DIN and another‑‑Respondents
  • 1986 P Cr SAMUAL SHAD Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent