1981 PLP 101 (CLC)
MUHAMMAD YOUSAF‑Petitioner Versus Mian FAIZ MUHAMMAD‑Respondent
| Citation | 1981 PLP 101 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Aamer Raza A. Khan, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD YOUSAF‑Petitioner Versus Mian FAIZ MUHAMMAD‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 101 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 101 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Aamer Raza A. Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 101 (CLC) (MUHAMMAD YOUSAF‑Petitioner Versus Mian FAIZ MUHAMMAD‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Muhammad Hussain A wan for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(a) Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882)‑ __ S. 106‑Notice‑Question of fact‑Non‑service of notice, held, a question of fact.‑[Question of fact]. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ ‑ O. VI, r. 6 and Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), S. 106 Pleadings‑Pleas of fact must be taken by parties in pleadings Opposite‑party cannot be allowed to be taken by surprise‑‑Plea of non‑service of notice not raised by defendant nor supported by evidence‑Finding of lower Court holding question of non‑service of notice having been waived in circumstances, held, without any jurisdictional defect.‑[Pleadings]. Aushutosh Basuk v. S. M. Rehmat Ullah 1970 S C M R 386; Balqees Sultana v. Settlement Commissioner P L D 1975 Lah. 185; Mst. Bachi Bai v. Ghulam Abbas P L D 1972 Kar. 278 and Shah Alam Co‑operative House Building Society v. House Building Finance Corporation P L D 1972 Kar. 178 distinguished. Province of East Pakistan v. Messrs Allah Wala P L D 1971 S C 476 not relevant.
Judgment & Decree
(a) Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882)‑ __ S. 106‑Notice‑Question of fact‑Non‑service of notice, held, a question of fact.‑[Question of fact]. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ ‑ O. VI, r. 6 and Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), S. 106 Pleadings‑Pleas of fact must be taken by parties in pleadings Opposite‑party cannot be allowed to be taken by surprise‑‑Plea of non‑service of notice not raised by defendant nor supported by evidence‑Finding of lower Court holding question of non‑service of notice having been waived in circumstances, held, without any jurisdictional defect.‑[Pleadings]. Aushutosh Basuk v. S. M. Rehmat Ullah 1970 S C M R 386; Balqees Sultana v. Settlement Commissioner P L D 1975 Lah. 185; Mst. Bachi Bai v. Ghulam Abbas P L D 1972 Kar. 278 and Shah Alam Co‑operative House Building Society v. House Building Finance Corporation P L D 1972 Kar. 178 distinguished. Province of East Pakistan v. Messrs Allah Wala P L D 1971 S C 476 not relevant. Muhammad Hussain A wan for Petitioner.