P L D 1979 Lahore 34(1) (PLP)
MUKHTAR SULTANA-Petitioner Versus TASADAQ (TASADAQ HUSSAIN)-Respondent
| Citation | P L D 1979 Lahore 34(1) (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Vest Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)---.- S. 25-A-Husband filing suit for restitution of conjugal rights at B and wife subsequently filing suit for dissolution of marriage at Balance of convenience, held, lay in both suits being heard at M.-Transfer of civil case. |
| Bench Members | Aftab Hussain, J |
| Parties | MUKHTAR SULTANA-Petitioner Versus TASADAQ (TASADAQ HUSSAIN)-Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1979 Lahore 34(1) (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1979 Lahore 34(1) (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Vest Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)---.- S. 25-A-Husband filing suit for restitution of conjugal rights at B and wife subsequently filing suit for dissolution of marriage at Balance of convenience, held, lay in both suits being heard at M.-Transfer of civil case. bench comprising: Aftab Hussain, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1979 Lahore 34(1) (PLP) (MUKHTAR SULTANA-Petitioner Versus TASADAQ (TASADAQ HUSSAIN)-Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Nemo for Petitioner.
- . Malik Manzoor Ahmad for Respondent.
- Date of hearing : 3rd February 1977.
Headnotes / Summary
Vest Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)
.- S. 25-A-Husband filing suit for restitution of conjugal rights at B and wife subsequently filing suit for dissolution of marriage at Balance of convenience, held, lay in both suits being heard at M.-[Transfer of civil case].
Judgment & Decree
I have heard Mr. Manzoor Ahmad, Advocate for the respondent. He has raised objection that the suit for restitution of conjugal rights was filed earlier than the suit for dissolution of marriage. He also argued that the family of the petitioner is living at Bahawalpur.
2. After considering the arguments I am of the view that it will b better if the two suits, one for 'restitution of conjugal rights' and the other for 'dissolution of marriage' are consolidated in one Court. The balance o1 convenience is in transferring the suit of the respondent to the Court it Multan. I, therefore, allow the petition, direct that the suit of Tasadm Hussain v. Mukhtar Sultana and others pending in the Family Court, Bahawal pur, be transferred to the Family Court at Multan (Mr. Afzal Hussain Kazmi Judge Family Court). S. A. I-L Order accordingly.