1981 PLP 276 (CLC)
ANJUM REHMAT AND ANOTHER‑Plaintiffs Versus (RTD.) SQN/LDR. Sheikh GULAM SADIQ‑Defendant
| Citation | 1981 PLP 276 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | K. A. Ghani, J |
| Parties | ANJUM REHMAT AND ANOTHER‑Plaintiffs Versus (RTD.) SQN/LDR. Sheikh GULAM SADIQ‑Defendant |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 276 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 276 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: K. A. Ghani, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 276 (CLC) (ANJUM REHMAT AND ANOTHER‑Plaintiffs Versus (RTD.) SQN/LDR. Sheikh GULAM SADIQ‑Defendant). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Dates of hearing : 23rd and 24th November, 1980.
Headnotes / Summary
0. XXXIX, rr. 1 & 2 and Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S. 12 Injunction‑Specific performance of contract of sale of immovable pro perty‑Prima facie plaintiffs able to show that they have an agreement of sale in their favour‑Law settled that breach of contract of transfer of immovable property cannot be relieved by compensation in money Balance of convenience also lying in keeping property available in case suit decreed in favour of plaintiffs‑Injunction granted restraining defendant to alienate property.‑[Injunction]. Perveen Begum's case P L D 1956 Kar. 521, and Abdul Karim v. Muhammad Shafi 1973 S C M R 225 ref. Faizuddfn for Plaintiffs. Wajihuddin and Abdus Sattar for Defendant. Sohail Muzaffar Advocate for Shaikh M. Rafig for the Intervenor.
Judgment & Decree
Suit No.879 of 1979, decided on 12th December, 1980.
0. XXXIX, rr. 1 & 2 and Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S. 12 Injunction‑Specific performance of contract of sale of immovable pro perty‑Prima facie plaintiffs able to show that they have an agreement of sale in their favour‑Law settled that breach of contract of transfer of immovable property cannot be relieved by compensation in money Balance of convenience also lying in keeping property available in case suit decreed in favour of plaintiffs‑Injunction granted restraining defendant to alienate property.‑[Injunction]. Perveen Begum's case P L D 1956 Kar. 521, and Abdul Karim v. Muhammad Shafi 1973 S C M R 225 ref. Faizuddfn for Plaintiffs. Wajihuddin and Abdus Sattar for Defendant. Sohail Muzaffar Advocate for Shaikh M. Rafig for the Intervenor. Dates of hearing : 23rd and 24th November, 1980.