1990 PLP 539 (SCMR)
Ch. MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN and others‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD JAMEEL and others‑‑Respondents .
| Citation | 1990 PLP 539 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Javid lqbal, JJ |
| Parties | Ch. MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN and others‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD JAMEEL and others‑‑Respondents . |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 539 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 539 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Javid lqbal, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 539 (SCMR) (Ch. MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN and others‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD JAMEEL and others‑‑Respondents .). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Khawaja Mushtaq Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Date of hearing: 17th July, 1988.
Headnotes / Summary
(Against the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated the 25th April, 1981 in Writ Petition No. 194/R of 1981.) ‑‑‑Arts. 199 & 185(3)‑‑‑High Court's disposal of Constitutional petition filed by the respondents' side with effect that without accepting the petition, major relief had been allowed to them, prima facie without justification‑‑‑Disposal of Constitutional petition in such manner impugned by the Settlement Authorities‑‑ Held disposal of Writ Petition by the impugned order was prima facie not in accordance with the normal practice of the High Court, when dealing with question of vital importance to the parties concerned‑‑‑Petition for leave to appeal was thus converted into appeal and fixed for early hearing. Nemo for\Respondents.
Judgment & Decree
Khawaja Mushtaq Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners. Nemo for\Respondents. Date of hearing: 17th July, 1988. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑Leave to appeal has been sought by the Settlement Authorities against the "disposal" of a writ petition filed by the respondents' side, with the effect that without "accepting" the petition, major relief has been allowed to them prima facie, without justification. After hearing the learned counsel, we feel that the "disposal" of the writ petition by the impugned order is prima facie not in accordance with the normal practice of the High Court, when dealing with questions of vital importance to the parties concerned. This petition accordingly is converted into an appeal and fixed for hearing in October, 1988. The appeal shall be prepared on the present record with direction to the parties concerned to file all necessary additional documents. A.A./M‑965/S . Leave granted.