2008 P Cr (PLP)
ARBELO — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2008 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ARBELO — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 P Cr (PLP) (ARBELO — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S.11
Applicant/accused repeated bail application before the Trial Court, but it was dismissed and the Trial Court was lying vacant for the last about 6 months
Counsel for complainant had opposed the bail application on merits, but had no objection if the transfer of the case was considered
Sessions Judge was directed to recall the case from the Trial Court and either to continue himself with the case or assign same to any other Additional Sessions Judge
Both the counsel agreed that abductee was to be examined first and thereafter the complainant was to be examined
Such exercise was to be done expeditiously.
Judgment & Decree
MUNIB AHMAD KHAN, J.
After arguing to some extent, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has repeated bail application before the trial Court but it has been dismissed and now the trial Court is lying vacant for the last about 6 months. Mr. Ghanghro has opposed the bail application on merits but has no objection if the transfer of the case is considered. In the circumstances, the Sessions Judge, Shikarpur is directed to recall the case file from the trial Court and either to continue himself with the ease or may assign it to any other Additional Sessions Judge. Both the learned counsel agreed that the abductee Mst. Badsha is to be examined first and thereafter the complainant is to be examined. This exercise is to be done expeditiously and if possible within a period of 4 months whereafter the applicant may move the bail application before the trial Court. With this observation, bail application stands disposed of. H.B.T./A-134/K Order accordingly.