1994 P Cr (PLP)
MOHABBAT ALI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1994 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MOHABBAT ALI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 P Cr (PLP) (MOHABBAT ALI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Khadim Hussain Bhatti for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497(2)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302/324/452/148/149
Accused who had been attributed a fire-arm injury to a prosecution witness had been placed in Column No.2 of the challan
Case against accused in circumstances appeared to be one of further inquiry
Accused was granted bail accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
Khadim Hussain Bhatti for Petitioner. Pervaiz Inayat Malik for the State. Date of hearing: 22nd August, 1994. This bail application under section 497, Criminal Procedure Code has been filed by Mohabbat Ali son of Muhammad Khalil, caste Rajput resident of Bhoroki Virkan, Police Station Sadar, Kamokey, District Gujranwala, who has been arrested in respect of investigation of F.I.R. No.103/93, dated 14-4-1993 under sections 302, 324, 452, 148 and 149, P.P.C. registered at Police Station Sadar, Kamokey, District Gujranwala.
2. The role attributed to the petitioner in the F.I.R. is that he has caused fire-arm injury to Riasat Ali injured P.W. The learned counsel for the petitioner that the same injury has also been attributed to Abdul Wakeel co-accused contends it. It is further contended that the name of the petitioner has been placed in Column No.2 of the challan.
3. The learned counsel on behalf of the State submits that the challan has been completed and record of the case has been submitted to Sessions Court for trial. However, respondent No.3, S.I. Police Station Sadar, Kamokey, District Gujranwala, has confirmed that the name of the petitioner, Mohabbat Ali, has been placed in Column 2 of the challan.
4. In these circumstances, this appears to be, a case of further inquiry. B The petitioner is granted bail, subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the, amount of one hundred thousand rupees with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner/Duty Magistrate, Gujranwala. N.H.Q./M-1824/L Bail granted.