1988 PLP 486 (SCMR)
AFTAB AHMAD KHAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1988 PLP 486 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain, Javid Iqbal and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | AFTAB AHMAD KHAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 PLP 486 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 PLP 486 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Javid Iqbal and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 PLP 486 (SCMR) (AFTAB AHMAD KHAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Rana Abdur Rahim Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate- on-Record for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 16th January, 1988.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the order dated 21-12-1987 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Criminal Miscellaneous No.1174-B of 1987).
S.497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302, 307 & 324 read with Ss.148 & 149-Bail--Petitioner one of persons, to whom fatal blow caused to deceased, had been attributed--No principle of law found to have been violated by High Court in rejecting petitioner's prayer for grant of bail--Petition dismissed. Nemo for the State.
Judgment & Decree
SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.--This is a petition for special leave to appeal from the order dated 21-12-1987 of the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, whereby the petitioner's application for bail was rejected.
2. The petitioner was involved in a case registered under sections 302, 307 and 324, read with sections 149 and 148 of the Pakistan Penal Code. He is one of the persons to whom the fatal blow caused A to the deceased has been attributed.
3. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner we do not find that in rejecting the petitioner's prayer the High Court has violated any principle of law. The petition is dismissed. S. Q./A-159/S Petition dismissed.