1981 PLP 146 (CLC)
Mst. AKHTAR BEGUM‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
| Citation | 1981 PLP 146 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | (Azad J & K |
| Bench Members | Abdul Majeed Mallick, J |
| Parties | Mst. AKHTAR BEGUM‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 146 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 146 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the (Azad J & K bench comprising: Abdul Majeed Mallick, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 146 (CLC) (Mst. AKHTAR BEGUM‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- ---O. IX, r. 8 &, O. XVII, r. 2 read with Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Art. 163‑Words "hearing of suit" in O. IX, r. 8 and O. XVII, r. 2 Used in a definite sense‑Expression refers to determination of questions resulting in final determination of suit, filing of written statement, recording of evidence, hearing of arguments rind rendering judgment‑‑Date in question fixed for notice to counsel of plaintiff ‑Issue of notice or its service on counsel not proved on record'‑Date fixed, held, not date of hearing and provisions of O. XVII, r, 2 and O. IX, r. 8 not applicable.‑[Interpretation of statutes].
- Manzoor Ahmed for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
Ghulam Farid‑Muhammad Latif v. Central Bank of India Ltd. P L D 1954 Lah. 575 ; Mst. Barkat Bibi v. Fateh Ali P L D 1949 Lah. 434 Grimault & Co. v. Charan Das & Sons A I R 1934 Lah. 237 ; Mahesha Mal Dayal Das v. Muhammad Jamil A I R 1929 Lah. 374 ; Sheikh Muhammad v. Mst. Rukmina Kunwar A I R 1946 All. 506 ; Rarnswaroop Reghuwardayal and others v. Mata Parsad Prabhudayal A I R 1952 Madh. Pra. 8 and Manohar Das v. Birandasi Sheikhupurian A I R 1936 Lah. 280 and Khalid Mahmood v. State P I. D 1970 Lah. 470 ref. Ch. Muhammad Hanif for, Appellant. Date of Institution : 2nd June, 1979.
Judgment & Decree
Civil Appeal No. 1 of 1979, decided on 8th May, 1980.
O. IX, r. 8 &, O. XVII, r. 2 read with Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Art. 163‑Words "hearing of suit" in O. IX, r. 8 and O. XVII, r. 2 Used in a definite sense‑Expression refers to determination of questions resulting in final determination of suit, filing of written statement, recording of evidence, hearing of arguments rind rendering judgment‑‑Date in question fixed for notice to counsel of plaintiff ‑Issue of notice or its service on counsel not proved on record'‑Date fixed, held, not date of hearing and provisions of O. XVII, r, 2 and O. IX, r. 8 not applicable.‑[Interpretation of statutes]. Ghulam Farid‑Muhammad Latif v. Central Bank of India Ltd. P L D 1954 Lah. 575 ; Mst. Barkat Bibi v. Fateh Ali P L D 1949 Lah. 434 Grimault & Co. v. Charan Das & Sons A I R 1934 Lah. 237 ; Mahesha Mal Dayal Das v. Muhammad Jamil A I R 1929 Lah. 374 ; Sheikh Muhammad v. Mst. Rukmina Kunwar A I R 1946 All. 506 ; Rarnswaroop Reghuwardayal and others v. Mata Parsad Prabhudayal A I R 1952 Madh. Pra. 8 and Manohar Das v. Birandasi Sheikhupurian A I R 1936 Lah. 280 and Khalid Mahmood v. State P I. D 1970 Lah. 470 ref. Ch. Muhammad Hanif for, Appellant. Manzoor Ahmed for Respondents. Date of Institution : 2nd June, 1979.