1987 PLP 1916(1) (MLD)
JAVED alias JAIDA allas PERVAIZ alias PA IJI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1987 PLP 1916(1) (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza, Actg. C J |
| Parties | JAVED alias JAIDA allas PERVAIZ alias PA IJI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 1916(1) (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 1916(1) (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza, Actg. C J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 1916(1) (MLD) (JAVED alias JAIDA allas PERVAIZ alias PA IJI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Ilyas Siddiqui for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S.497--Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII u` 1979), Ss.10 & 16--Bail, grant of--No allegation of sexual intercourse by accused though prosecutrix recovered from his house--Bail allowed in circumstances. M . Nawaz Abbasi, A.A.-G . for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Muhammad Ilyas Siddiqui for Petitioner. M . Nawaz Abbasi, A.A.-G . for the State. Javed alias Jaida alias Pervaiz alias Paiji son of Noora Bhatf; resident of Dhoke Kashmirian, Rawalpindi is one of the accused in a case registered on 7-5-1987, at Police Station Waris Khan Rawalpindi under section 10/16 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979. I do not think it is necessary to discuss the facts in detail because the allegation against the petitioner is that it was from his house that Mst. Bashiran was recovered. Learned counsel laid great stress on the fact that nowhere Mst. Bashiran stated that the petitioner had sexual intercourse with her. The A.A.-G. has not been able to controvert this position. In the absence of any allegation regarding sexual intercourse I do not find any justification to keep the petitioner behind the bars. He p is accordingly admitted to bail in the sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A . C . City. Rawalpindi. S.A./J-9/L Bail allowed.