993 PLP 1992 (SCMR)
AMANAT ALI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 993 PLP 1992 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Shafiur Rahman, Muhammad Afzal Lone and |
| Parties | AMANAT ALI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 993 PLP 1992 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 993 PLP 1992 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Shafiur Rahman, Muhammad Afzal Lone and.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 993 PLP 1992 (SCMR) (AMANAT ALI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Ghulam Murtaza Khan, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 8th June, 1993.
- Faiz‑ur‑Rehman, Advocate Supreme Court for the State.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment/order dated 21‑3‑1993, of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, passed in Crl. Misc. No. 823‑B/93).
S. 497‑‑‑Penal Code ,(XLV of 1860), S. 302/324/337‑A/337 D/337 F /148 /149‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)‑‑‑Bail‑ According to F.I.R. only a `Lalkara' had been attributed to the accused‑‑ Petition for leave to appeal was converted into appeal accordingly and the accused was enlarged on bail. Faiz‑ur‑Rehman, Advocate Supreme Court for the State.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL LONE, J: ‑‑Leave to appeal is sought from the High Court's order dated 21‑3‑1993, refusing bail to Amanat Ali petitioner, against whom alongwith 5 others a case has been registered under sections 302, P.P.C:, 324/337 ADF, Qisas and Diyat Ordinance read with section 148/149, P.P.C., for committing the murder of Nawaz; attempting to commit "Qatl‑e‑Amd" and causing hurt to the P.Ws.
2. We have heard the learned counsel and examined the record. According to the averments made in the F.I.R. only a Lalkara has been attributed to the petitioner. We convert this petition into appeal and consider it a fit case for grant of bail. He is enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a bail bond in the sum of Rs.25,000 with two sureties each in the alike amount to the satisfaction of A.C., Nankana Saheb, District Sheikhupua. N.H.Q./A‑1029/S Bail allowed.