PLD 1961

P L D 1961 W (PLP)

Mst. BIBI AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus Mst. HASHIM BIBI AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Decided Date
Revision Side No. 164 of 1960‑61, decided on 25th February 1961, District Lyallpur.
Honorable Judges
Nasir Ahmed, Member Board of Revenue,
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation P L D 1961 W (PLP)
Forum / Court
Bench Members Nasir Ahmed, Member Board of Revenue,
Parties Mst. BIBI AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus Mst. HASHIM BIBI AND OTHERS‑Respondents
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1961 W (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1961 W (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: Nasir Ahmed, Member Board of Revenue,.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1961 W (PLP) (Mst. BIBI AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus Mst. HASHIM BIBI AND OTHERS‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Mr. Lodhi for Petitioners.

Headnotes / Summary

Punjab Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1887), S. 16‑Revision PracticeRevision not filed within 90 days from date of order Special reasons not shown‑Petition not to be entertained.

Judgment & Decree

This application for revision has been made after a lapse of 90 days. The normal practice of the Financial Commissioners followed by the Board of Revenue has been not to entertain applications after a period of 90 days in spite of the fact that the powers of the Board of Revenue to interfere in revision under section 16 have no such limitation. No special remoteness have been adduced for making an exception. The application is accordingly dismissed. K.M. A. Petition dismissed.