1994 PLP 1299 (MLD)
MUHAMMAD IRSHAD and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1994 PLP 1299 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD IRSHAD and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 PLP 1299 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 PLP 1299 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 PLP 1299 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD IRSHAD and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Hussain Chhachar for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Net had been cast too wide roping in four persons for five blunt weapon injuries
Accused was aged about 55 years and his son had been seriously injured
Young fellows armed with Sotas were present who could very well have caused five injuries to the injured prosecution witness-- Accused was allowed bail in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
The occurrence admittedly took place and that too on a very large ''scale at 7-30 a.m. on 13-4-1992. Maqsood Ahmad is the lodger of F.I.R. No.104/92 on the same day at 9-30 a.m.
2. The counter-version was given by Anjum Pervaiz son of Muhammad Irshad, petitioner firstly on 16-4-1992 and then a little improved versions to say on 13-8-1992.
3. Muhammad Irshad and Muhammad Arshad petitioners according to F.I.R. lodged by Maqsood Ahmad were armed with Sotas and so were their two co-accused Zafar Alam and Abdul Sattar and they caused injuries to Noor Muhammad P.W. Noor Muhammad is having only five blunt weapon injuries out of which only one is grievous. For five injuries four accused have been roped in.
4. Yasin petitioner (Criminal Miscellaneous No.3619/B of 1993) is alleged to have fired his gun hitting Anjum Pervaiz in the leg and as a result thereof the same has now been amputated. .
5. In this view of the matter both the bail petitions are being taken up together
6. As already observed, there is evidence collected by the police implicating Yasin petitioner as well as the present petitioners in the occurrence but the contention of the learned counsel for Muhammad Irshad petitioner is correct to the extent that for causing five blunt weapon injuries the net has been cast too wide. Muhammad Irshad petitioner is aged about 55 years and his son Anjum Pervaiz was seriously injured with the amputation of the leg with three others, namely Zafar Alam, Arshad petitioner and Abdul Sattar co- accused. Young fellows armed with Sotas were present, they could very well have caused five injuries to Noor Muhammad. In this view of the matter only Irshad petitioner is allowed bail in the sum of Rs.50,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court: The bail petitions on behalf of Muhammad Arshad and Muhammad Yasin, petitioners are dismissed. N.H.Q./M-1505/L Order accordingly.