SCMR 1986

1986 PLP 1833 (SCMR)

ALLAH BUX‑‑Petitioner Versus ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN‑‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
N/A
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Afza1 Zullah, S.A. Nusrat and Ali Hussain Qazilbash, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1986 PLP 1833 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Muhammad Afza1 Zullah, S.A. Nusrat and Ali Hussain Qazilbash, JJ
Parties ALLAH BUX‑‑Petitioner Versus ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN‑‑Respondent
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1833 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1833 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afza1 Zullah, S.A. Nusrat and Ali Hussain Qazilbash, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1833 (SCMR) (ALLAH BUX‑‑Petitioner Versus ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Nemo for Respondents.

Judgment & Decree

S.A. NUSRAT, J.‑‑All the above petitions were dismissed by) the learned Federal Service Tribunal as‑ per impugned judgment as being hopelessly time‑barred and the petitioners having failed to furnish any satisfactory explanation for the condonation of delay. Such findings of the learned Tribunal are unexceptionable. The petitions are, therefore, dismissed. 2. However, the petitioners have, by way of alternative, showed their willingness to accept the offer of the Government contained it: paragraph 8 of our judgment passed in Civil Appeal No. 140 of 1984 and Civil Petition No. 121‑R of 1983 (and 367 other petitions) decided on 29‑2‑1984, reported as Federation of Pakistan v . Riaz Ahmad Baig and others 1.984 S C M R 759. Though the option now made by the petitioners is somewhat delayed, we expect that it shall be considered by the Government on its own merits. M. Y. H. Leave refused.