2010 PLP 910 (MLD)
Syed NAZAR HUSSAIN SHAH — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AMEER — Respondent
| Citation | 2010 PLP 910 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Syed NAZAR HUSSAIN SHAH — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AMEER — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 PLP 910 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 PLP 910 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 PLP 910 (MLD) (Syed NAZAR HUSSAIN SHAH — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AMEER — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Allah Bakhsh Gondal for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
O. XXXIX, Rr.1, 2 & S.115
Interim injunction, application for
Trial Court dismissed application filed by the petitioner for grant of interim injunction and appeal filed against judgment of the Trial Court was also dismissed by the Appellate Court
Petitioner had challenged concurrent judgments of the two courts below alleging same to be illegal and against law and facts
Counsel for the respondent produced a certified copy of the judgment and decree and had stated that the main suit in which the petitioner had sought interim injunction, had been dismissed
Petitioner had left with no cause of action in view of said statement of respondent and certified copy of judgment and decree of said suit.
Judgment & Decree
CH. MUHAMMAD TARIQ, J.
This Civil Revision has been directed against the judgment, dated 27-2-2008 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Bhalwal District Sargodah whereby learned Additional District Judge dismissed the appeal and confirmed the judgment of Mr. Falak Sher Jasra, learned Civil Judge, Bhalwal, dated 23-1-2008 whereby learned Civil Judge dismissed the application of the petitioner for grant of interim injunction. The petitioner has prayed that the impugned judgment as well as judgment passed by the learned trial Court are illegal, against law and facts and are liable to be set aside with the prayer that the petitioner be granted interim stay order. Today, learned counsel for the respondent has appeared who has produced a certified copy of judgment and decree, dated 16-12-2009 and has stated at the bar that the main suit in which the petitioner has sought interim injunction has been dismissed on 16-12-2009.
2. In view of statement of learned counsel for the respondent and certified copy of judgment and decree, dated 16-12-2009 produced by him, the petitioner has left with no cause of action. Civil Revision is dismissed being infructous. H.B.T./N-23/L???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Petition dismissed.