1998 PLP 2726 (SCMR)
THE JOINT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL SAVING, 121‑D GULBERG‑II, LAHORE and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Mst. NASEEM AKHTAR and another‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1998 PLP 2726 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Raja Afrasiab Khan and Sh. Riaz Ahmad, JJ |
| Parties | THE JOINT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL SAVING, 121‑D GULBERG‑II, LAHORE and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Mst. NASEEM AKHTAR and another‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1998 PLP 2726 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1998 PLP 2726 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Raja Afrasiab Khan and Sh. Riaz Ahmad, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1998 PLP 2726 (SCMR) (THE JOINT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL SAVING, 121‑D GULBERG‑II, LAHORE and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Mst. NASEEM AKHTAR and another‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- ‑‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Counsel of petitioners stated that Constitutional petition was still pending adjudication before High Court and in case, same was expeditiously disposed of, he would not press petition for leave to appeal‑‑‑Counsel for respondents did not raise objection to suggestion of petitioner's counsel but expressed satisfaction with that statement made on behalf of petitioners‑‑ Supreme Court on basis of consent of parties directed that Constitutional petition pending between parties in High Court be heard and decided within three months‑‑‑Interim relief which had already been granted by Supreme Court would continue till final hearing of said Constitutional petition‑‑‑Petition for leave to appeal was disposed of in terms of parties' statement.
- Sher Zaman Khan, Deputy Attorney‑General with Rao Muhammad Yusuf Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Qadeer Ahmad Siddiqui, Advocate Supreme Court with S. Abul Aasim Jafri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 1st January, 1998.
- ----Art. 185(3)---Counsel of petitioners stated that Constitutional petition was still pending adjudication before High Court and in case, same was expeditiously disposed of, he would not press petition for leave to appeal---Counsel for respondents did not raise objection to suggestion of petitioner's counsel but expressed satisfaction with that statement made on behalf of petitioners-- Supreme Court on basis of consent of parties directed that Constitutional petition pending between parties in High Court be heard and decided within three months---Interim relief which had already been granted by Supreme Court would continue till final hearing of said Constitutional petition---Petition for leave to appeal was disposed of in terms of parties' statement.
- Sher Zaman Khan, Deputy Attorney-General with Rao Muhammad Yusuf Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
- Qadeer Ahmad Siddiqui, Advocate Supreme Court with S. Abul Aasim Jafri, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the order of the Lahore High Court dated 24‑3‑1997 passed in C.M. No.889 of 1997 in Writ Petition No.4104 of 1996).
Judgment & Decree
RAJA AFRASIAB KHAN, J.
We have heard Mr. Sher Zaman Khan, learned Deputy Attorney-General appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Qadeer Ahmad Siddiqui, learned counsel for the respondents at some length. The learned counsel states that the writ petition is still pending adjudication ~C before the High Court and in case, it is expeditiously disposed of, he will not press this petition. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the suggestion of the petitioners' counsel. He is satisfied with this statement. In these circumstances, the Writ Petition No.4104 pending between the parties in the High Court may be heard and decided within three months. The interim relief which has already been granted by this Court on 15-7-1997 shall continue till the final hearing of the said writ petition. With this observation, this petition stands disposed of. A.A./J-9/S Order accordingly.