2011 PLP 432 (YLR)
KALEEM ABBAS — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents
| Citation | 2011 PLP 432 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Tariq Javed, J |
| Parties | KALEEM ABBAS — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2011 PLP 432 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2011 PLP 432 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Tariq Javed, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2011 PLP 432 (YLR) (KALEEM ABBAS — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Khalid Mehmood Arain for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S.497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302/364/109/34
Qalt-e-amd, kidnap ping or abducting in order to murder, abetment
Motorcycle used in the alleged occurrence, the weapon of offence and the dead body of the deceased had been recovered at the instance of accused
Prima facie, accused was connected with the commission of the Crime
Bail was declined to accused in circumstances. Nadir Manzoor Duggal, D.P.G. for the State. Qaiser Abbas S.-I. with record. Masood Riaz for the Complainant.
Judgment & Decree
TARIQ JAVED, J.
The petitioner, through this petition, seeks post arrest bail in case F.I.R. No. 230, dated 7-6-2008 registered under sections 302/ 364/109/34, P.P.C. at Police Station, Mian Channu District Khanewal.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that there is delay of three days in lodging the F.I.R. which has not been explained; that the petitioner has falsely been roped in the instant case; that there is no eye-witness and the petitioner-accused has been arrested only on basis of so-called extra judicial confession; that co-accused of the petitioner has been granted bail and that story of F.I.R. belies on the face of it.
3. The learned DPG has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail on the ground that recoveries of pistol and motorcycle have been effected from the petitioner and the dead body of the deceased has been recovered on the pointation of the petitioner.
4. Heard. Record perused.
5. The very fact that Motorcycle used in the alleged occurrence as well as weapon of offence and the dead body were recovered at his instance. It cannot be said that prima facie the petitioner is not connected in the commission of crime.
6. For what has been discussed above, this petition having no merits is dismissed. N.H.Q./K-20/L Bail refused.