2010 PLP 1250 (MLD)
Messrs KHURSHID OIL MILLS, LAYYAH through Proprietor and 2 others — Petitioners Versus BANK OF PUNJAB through Branch Manager — Respondent
| Citation | 2010 PLP 1250 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Messrs KHURSHID OIL MILLS, LAYYAH through Proprietor and 2 others — Petitioners Versus BANK OF PUNJAB through Branch Manager — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Court Fees Act (VII of 1870) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 PLP 1250 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Court Fees Act (VII of 1870) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 PLP 1250 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 PLP 1250 (MLD) (Messrs KHURSHID OIL MILLS, LAYYAH through Proprietor and 2 others — Petitioners Versus BANK OF PUNJAB through Branch Manager — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Malik Muhammad Tariq Rajwana for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S.13
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.96
Refund of court-fee-Appeal had been withdrawn after full satisfaction of the decree by the appellant himself on first appearance of the respondent within the time provided by the court
Court in fact endeavoured nothing on the appeal, but to provide the time to appellant to settle the matter of the decree-holder, which he did
Total amount of the court fee was allowed to be refunded, in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
C.M. No. 1327-C of 2009 Vide order, dated 20-10-2009 passed by C.M. No. 1225-C of 2009, because of withdrawal of R.F.A., the half of the court-fee was allowed to be refunded but for nature of stamp paper annexed, the half of the amount cannot be refunded to the appellant and even to that effect the office raised objection. Record gone through. As the R.F.A. was withdrawn after full satisfaction of the decree by the appellant himself on first appearance of the respondent within the time provided by this Court, therefore, in fact the Court endeavoured nothing on the R.F.A. but to provide the time to appellant to settle the matter of the decree holder which he did. In the circumstances, the order, dated 20-10-2009 is reviewed and the total amount of the court-fee is allowed to be refunded. The instant C.M. is disposed of. H.B.T./K-33/L Order accordingly.