1987 PLP 841 (SCMR)
RAHIM BAKHSH and another‑‑Petitioners Versus JAN MUHAMMAD and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1987 PLP 841 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | RAHIM BAKHSH and another‑‑Petitioners Versus JAN MUHAMMAD and others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 841 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 841 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 841 (SCMR) (RAHIM BAKHSH and another‑‑Petitioners Versus JAN MUHAMMAD and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Kh. Muhammad Farooq, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 9th March, 1987.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 16‑4‑1980 in Writ Petition No.1806‑R of 1974). ‑‑‑S. 10 & Sched.‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts. 185(3) & 199‑‑Transfer of evacuee property‑‑Settlement Commissioner holding that property in dispute comprised two units and transferring one of the units to respondents‑‑Order of High Court declining to interfere with such order not suffering from any infirmity‑‑Petition for leave to appeal dismissed.
Judgment & Decree
(On appeal from the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 16‑4‑1980 in Writ Petition No.1806‑R of 1974). ‑‑‑S. 10 & Sched.‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts. 185(3) & 199‑‑Transfer of evacuee property‑‑Settlement Commissioner holding that property in dispute comprised two units and transferring one of the units to respondents‑‑Order of High Court declining to interfere with such order not suffering from any infirmity‑‑Petition for leave to appeal dismissed. Kh. Muhammad Farooq, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioners. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 9th March, 1987. SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.‑‑ In this petition for special leave to appeal the only question for consideration is whether the property initially transferred to the petitioners was one unit or it consisted of two units. The Settlement Commissioner held that it comprised two units; accordingly, he transferred one of the units to respondents Nos.1 and
2. The High Court declined to interfere with the order of the Settlement Commissioner in this regard We are not persuaded that suffered from any infirmity. We would, therefore, dismiss S.S.G/R.S Petition dismissed.