1987 PLP 732 (SCMR)
MUHAMMAD ISMAIL‑‑Petitioner Versus FAIZ BAKHSH and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1987 PLP 732 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain, |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ISMAIL‑‑Petitioner Versus FAIZ BAKHSH and others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 732 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 732 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain,.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 732 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD ISMAIL‑‑Petitioner Versus FAIZ BAKHSH and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Saeed‑ud‑Din, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 16th February, 1987.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 29‑1‑1980 in Writ Petition No. 447/R of 1974). ‑‑‑Arts. 185(3) & 199‑‑Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), S.10 & Sched.‑‑Transfer of property‑‑Finding of fact by Settlement Authorities that the property was auctioned in favour of petitioner at a time when L.H. Forms filed by respondents were still lying undisposed of‑‑High Court found to have very properly refused to interfere with such finding‑‑Leave to appeal refused.
Judgment & Decree
(On appeal from the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 29‑1‑1980 in Writ Petition No. 447/R of 1974). ‑‑‑Arts. 185(3) & 199‑‑Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), S.10 & Sched.‑‑Transfer of property‑‑Finding of fact by Settlement Authorities that the property was auctioned in favour of petitioner at a time when L.H. Forms filed by respondents were still lying undisposed of‑‑High Court found to have very properly refused to interfere with such finding‑‑Leave to appeal refused. Saeed‑ud‑Din, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 16th February, 1987. SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.‑‑ This is a petition for special leave to appeal from the judgment dated 29‑1‑1980 of the Lahore High Court dismissing the constitutional petition of the petitioner.
2. There is a finding of fact by the Settlement authorities that the property was auctioned in favour of the petitioner at a ,time when the L. H. forms filed by respondents Nos. 1 and 2 were still lying undisposed of. The High Court very properly refused to interfere with this finding. In view of this position we do not think this is a fit case where leave to appeal should be granted to the petitioner. S.Q./M‑44/S Petition dismissed.