1998 P Cr (PLP)
Before Syed Deedar Hussain Shall, J Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1998 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Syed Deedar Hussain Shall, J |
| Parties | Before Syed Deedar Hussain Shall, J Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1998 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1998 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Syed Deedar Hussain Shall, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1998 P Cr (PLP) (Before Syed Deedar Hussain Shall, J Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑Penal Code (XL1i of 1860), Ss.302/452/504/114/147/148 & 149‑‑ Bail, grant of‑‑‑According to medical certificate duly issued by Cardiologist, after examining accused, accused was found to be heart patient and his detention in jail would be detrimental to his life‑‑‑Bail application pressed only by accused on the basis of his ailment, was allowed and he was ordered to be released on bail. Haji Qutubuddin Thahim for Applicant. Ghulam Sarwar Korai for Addl. A.G.
Judgment & Decree
Muhammad Sachal applicant/accused is facing trial for offence under sections 302/504/452/114/147/148 and 149, P.P.C. being the Police Crime No.38 of 1998 of Police Station Airport. Bail application on behalf of accused/ applicant was moved which was rejected by the learned IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Jacobabad vide order dated 24‑1‑1998 hence the present application. Mr. Haji Qutubuddin ‑Thahim learned counsel for the applicant/accused contends that he is pressing the bail application only on account of medical certificate as according to him the applicant/accused is sick person and his detention in jail is detrimental to his life. According to him applicant/accused was referred to Cardiologist, Chandka Medical College Hospital, Larkana who after examining the applicant/accused forwarded his opinion, which reads as under: "He is having Ischaemic Heart Disease with mild to modevate L.V., Dysfuction. He is symptomatic and partially controlled on medical treatment. He requires Medical Supervision off and on. His detention may be detrimental to life, as reported by Dr, Saeed Ahmed Sangi." According to medical certificate applicant is heart patient and his detention in jail could be detrimental to his life. Mr. Ghulam Sarwar Korai for Additional Advocate‑General opposes the bail application and states at the bar that the trial Court may be directed to examine the Doctor. The bail application is being pressed only on the basis of ailment of the applicant/accused, which is certified by the Cardiologist referred to hereinabove. In view of the medical certificate case for grant of bail is made out. Consequently, I allow the application. Applicant be released on bail on furnishing one solvent surety in the sum of Rs.2,50,000 and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. H.B.T./M‑294/K Bail granted.