1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
DOST MUHAMMAD CHANDIO and others Versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE and another
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Service Tribunal Sindh |
| Bench Members | Munawar Ali Khan, Chairman and Ghulam Mujadid Isran, Member |
| Parties | DOST MUHAMMAD CHANDIO and others Versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE and another |
| Primary Law | Sindh Service Tribunals Act (I of 1974) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Sindh Service Tribunals Act (I of 1974) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Sindh bench comprising: Munawar Ali Khan, Chairman and Ghulam Mujadid Isran, Member.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (DOST MUHAMMAD CHANDIO and others Versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE and another). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Abdul Sattar Mughal for Appellants.
- Zawar Hussain Shah, A.A: G. for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 14th March, 1991.
Headnotes / Summary
S.4
Sindh Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1988, Rr. 4 & 7(2)-- Removal from service
Enquiry Officer resorted to secret enquiry on basis of which he recommended major penalty against appellant
Enquiry against appellant having been conducted in accordance with Sindh Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules 1988, no provision existed in such Rules to make secret enquiry
Evidence collected by Enquiry Officer during secret enquiry could not be made basis for punishment of appellant
Penalty of removal from service was set aside in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE and another Appeals Nos.84, 89 and 99 of 1990, decided on 14th March, 1991.
S.4
Sindh Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1988, Rr. 4 & 7(2)-- Removal from service
Enquiry Officer resorted to secret enquiry on basis of which he recommended major penalty against appellant
Enquiry against appellant having been conducted in accordance with Sindh Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules 1988, no provision existed in such Rules to make secret enquiry
Evidence collected by Enquiry Officer during secret enquiry could not be made basis for punishment of appellant
Penalty of removal from service was set aside in circumstances. Abdul Sattar Mughal for Appellants. Zawar Hussain Shah, A.A: G. for Respondents. Date of hearing: 14th March, 1991.