1968 SCMR 152 (2) (PLP)
ELAHI BAKHSH-Petitioner Versus BUDHA (Deceased)-Respondent
| Citation | 1968 SCMR 152 (2) (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | DECIDED ON FACTS AND MERITS |
| Bench Members | S. A. Rahman, Hamoodur Rahman and Muhammad Yaqub Ali, JJ |
| Parties | ELAHI BAKHSH-Petitioner Versus BUDHA (Deceased)-Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1968 SCMR 152 (2) (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1968 SCMR 152 (2) (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the DECIDED ON FACTS AND MERITS bench comprising: S. A. Rahman, Hamoodur Rahman and Muhammad Yaqub Ali, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1968 SCMR 152 (2) (PLP) (ELAHI BAKHSH-Petitioner Versus BUDHA (Deceased)-Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Ghulam Mujtaba, Attorney for Petitioner.
- Abdul Karim Shaikh, Attorney for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
(In the matter of bringing legal representatives of deceased respondent Budha on record).
Judgment & Decree
S. A. RAHMAN, J.-Mr. Ghulam Mujtaba, Attorney for the petitioner states that he has had no notice of the petition put in by the respondent. The Attorney for the respondent confirms that this is so. The office should not have put up this case as it is incornplete. Let a copy of the notice of the petition filed by the tespondent be now served on the petitioner for the next date. The application made by the petitioner for impleading legal representatives of Budha, deceased, will be taken up for considera tion along with the application of the respondent on the date to be now fixed.