2003 P Cr (PLP)
NAZEER — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2003 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | NAZEER — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2003 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2003 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2003 P Cr (PLP) (NAZEER — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Headnotes / Summary
S.498
Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S.17(3)
Interim pre-arrest bail, confirmation of
Main accused against whom complainant had alleged that they had committed the offence, had been released on bail and case of accused was on better footing than that of said co-accused-- Prosecution had not opposed confirmation of bail
Accused was serving as Primary School Teacher and if bail was not confirmed he would lose his liberty and reputation
Bail was confirmed on same terms and conditions.
Judgment & Decree
S.498
Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S.17(3)
Interim pre-arrest bail, confirmation of
Main accused against whom complainant had alleged that they had committed the offence, had been released on bail and case of accused was on better footing than that of said co-accused-- Prosecution had not opposed confirmation of bail
Accused was serving as Primary School Teacher and if bail was not confirmed he would lose his liberty and reputation
Bail was confirmed on same terms and conditions. Abdul Rasool for Applicant. Ali Azhar Tunio, A.A.-G. for the State. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that co -accused Akhtiar and Aijaz have been released on bail as they were specifically named in the F.I.R. for the commission of offence. It is further stated by the learned counsel that complainant has involved the applicant on the ground that some assurance was made for return of the motorcycle by the applicant. Since the main accused against whom the complainant has alleged that they committed the offence and are released on bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mehar by an order dated 10-6-2002 and the case of the present applicant/accused is on better footing of the co-accused. Learned A.A.-G. has not opposed the confirmation of bail on the grounds raised by the learned counsel. The applicant is also serving as primary school teacher and if bail is not confirmed he will lose his liberty and reputation. In view of the circumstances raised by the learned counsel and learned A.A.-G. the bail is confirmed on the same terms and conditions. H.B.T./N-109/K Bail confirmed.