MLD 1994

1994 PLP 2032 (MLD)

MUHAMMAD HANIF — Petitioner Versus TARIQ and another — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No.180/B of 1994, decided on 22nd February, 1994,
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Amir Malik, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1994 PLP 2032 (MLD)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Muhammad Amir Malik, J
Parties MUHAMMAD HANIF — Petitioner Versus TARIQ and another — Respondents
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 PLP 2032 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 PLP 2032 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Amir Malik, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 PLP 2032 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD HANIF — Petitioner Versus TARIQ and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Syed Zahid Hussain Bokhary for Petitioner.
  • Zafarullah Khan for Respondent No.1.
  • Date of hearing: 22nd February, 1994.

Headnotes / Summary

S.497(5)

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302/34--Bail, cancellation of

Affidavit of one eye-witness was only to the extent. that he had not seen the occurrence and grant of bail to the accused on the said affidavit by the Sessions Court was misuse of its discretion when two other eye-witnesses supporting the prosecution case against the accused were still in the field

Defence plea now taken on behalf of the accused was never raised during investigation

Bail granted to accused by Sessions Court was cancelled in circumstances,-[Affidavit]. Syed Ali Raza for the State.

Judgment & Decree

Mst. Shamim Bibi deceased was the wife of Munir Ahmad. Munk Ahmad was previously married to Manzooran Bibi, the maternal-aunt of the petitioner. Two sisters of Munir Ahmad in exchange were married to Hamza co-accused and Aslam, the brothers of Mst. Manzooran.

2. The occurrence took place at 6-00 p.m. on 18-2-1992 at the house of the deceased and was reported to the police at 9-45 p.m. by Muhammad Hat complainant, the uncle of the deceased. According to his version the deceased was married (as second wife) to Munir Ahmad 6/7 years back and Mst. Manzooran left the house of her husband 15/16 years before the occurrence resulting in the simultaneous withdrawal from the house of their husbands by the sisters of Munir Ahmad. Taking this as a grudge the petitioner armed with a Carbine, cousins Rang Ellahi and Wakeel co-accused and maternal-uncle Hamza armed with Sotas, assaulted and the effective and the only shot was fired by the respondent hitting the deceased in the car.

3. The police declared Rang Ellahi and Hamza as innocent while Wakeel Was granted bail.

4. Tariq respondent was granted bail by Mr. Muhammad Akmal Qureshi, Additional Sessions Judge, Nankana a few days before his transfer order, as stated at the Bar, only on the affidavit of Muhammad Malik, brother of the deceased and an eye-witness as per the F.I.R.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has correctly contended that the discretion was prima facie misused by the learned Additional Sessions Judge inasmuch as three eye-witnesses namely Muhammad Hanif, his wife Mst. Hafeezan and Muhammad Malik were cited as eye-witnesses and the affidavit of Malik was only to the extent that he had not seen the occurrence with the result that still two eye-witnesses were left in the field.

6. Learned counsel for the respondent contended that Mst. Shamim had been taken away in a love affair and the complainant family themselves might have finished her. Case diaries have been looked into. No such plea was ever raised during investigation and rather in the affidavits of so many witnesses produced in defence of Rang Ellahi and Hamza clearly mentioned that on the firing and the alarm they reached and learnt that the respondent and Hamza co-accused had committed the murder.

7. The discretion having been misused by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, the petition is accepted and bail granted to the respondent is hereby cancelled. He would be taken into custody and sent to judicial lock-up.

8. A copy of the order be placed before my learned brother Incharge of the district where Mr. Muhammad Alimai Qureshi, Additional Sessions Judge is posted to have look into the conduct of the judicial officer. N.H.Q./M-1684/L?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Bail cancelled.