1981 PLP 1740 (CLC)
SIRAJ DIN AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD ISHAQ‑Respondent
| Citation | 1981 PLP 1740 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | SIRAJ DIN AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD ISHAQ‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 1740 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 1740 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 1740 (CLC) (SIRAJ DIN AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD ISHAQ‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Zafar Iqbal Khan for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 5‑"Sufficient cause"‑Means circumstances beyond control of party concerned.‑[Words and phrases].
S. 110 and Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S. 5‑Appeal filed without copy of judgment which applied for after expiry of limitation‑Delay unexplained ‑ No explanation also given for not making up court‑fee ‑ No case, held, made out for condonation of delay Appeal dismissed as barred by time.‑[Appeal (civil)‑Judgment Court‑fee].
Judgment & Decree
Molu Mal v. Sri Ram and others A I R 1921 Lah. 73; Kala v. Allah Dad P L D 1977 Lab. 376 and Akbar Khan v. Muhammad Razzaq P L D 1979 S C 830 ref. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑ ‑‑ S. 100 and Limitation Act (IX of 1908). S. 5‑Appeal may be admitted after period of limitation prescribed therefor when appellant satisfies Court that he had sufficient cause for not preferring appeal within such period.‑[Appeal (civil)]. (c) Limitation Act (IX of 1908)‑
S. 5‑"Sufficient cause"‑Means circumstances beyond control of party concerned.‑[Words and phrases]. (d) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑
S. 110 and Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S. 5‑Appeal filed without copy of judgment which applied for after expiry of limitation‑Delay unexplained ‑ No explanation also given for not making up court‑fee ‑ No case, held, made out for condonation of delay Appeal dismissed as barred by time.‑[Appeal (civil)‑Judgment Court‑fee]. Muhammad Hussain Jafri for Appellant. Zafar Iqbal Khan for Respondent. Date of hearing: 1st March, 1981.