2015 PLP 722 (YLR)
FIZA JAVED and another — Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Home Secretary and 6 others — Respondents
| Citation | 2015 PLP 722 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Sindh |
| Bench Members | Amer Raza Naqvi, J |
| Parties | FIZA JAVED and another — Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Home Secretary and 6 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2015 PLP 722 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2015 PLP 722 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Sindh bench comprising: Amer Raza Naqvi, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2015 PLP 722 (YLR) (FIZA JAVED and another — Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Home Secretary and 6 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Nemo for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 199
Constitutional petition
Petitioners had claimed marriage
Harassment by police
Petitioners expressed apprehension that they would be harassed by the police, although protection was provided to them but they did not appear in the court
Effect
Police were directed to act in accordance with law and if any protection was sought by anyone then such protection should be provided to him/her according to law
If any case had been registered against the petitioners with regard to claimed marriage then same should be disposed of in accordance with law
No unnecessary harassment should be caused to any one and nobody should be arrested in the FIR unless sufficient material was available with the police justifying such arrest
Constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly. SIP Ali Akbar Police Station Mobina Town and S.I. Madah Hussain Police Station Garden for present.
Judgment & Decree
AMER RAZA NAQVI, J.
On the last date of hearing notices were directed to be issued to the respondents and it was ordered that petitioners shall not be arrested in case any FIR is registered in connection with their claimed marriage. However, it was noted that affidavits have not been filed in accordance with rules and on query of the Court learned counsel for the petitioners informed that the required pro forma of NADRA although is not available in Court file, the same is available in his file. Office was directed to explain that how this petition was entertained and why the required pro forma, which should have been in the Court file is available with the learned counsel. It was also pointed out to the learned counsel for the petitioners that he has not filed any document showing the age of respondent No.1. Learned counsel was specifically directed that on the next date of hearing (today) he would produce some document in support of the fact that petitioner No.1 is 18 years old as claimed. Despite the above position since the petitioners expressed apprehension that they would be harassed, protection was provided to them. Today, neither the petitioners nor the counsel is present and no intimation has been received. In the above circumstances this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, however, it is expected that official respondents shall strictly act in accordance with law and in case any protection is sought by any one such protection shall be provided to him/her according to law. In case any FIR is registered against the petitioner in connection with their claimed marriage the same shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law. No unnecessary harassment shall be caused to any one and nobody shall be arrested in such FIR unless sufficient material is available with the police justifying such arrest. The petition along with the listed applications is disposed of in the above terms. AG/F-19/Sindh Order accordingly.