PLC 1979

1979 PLP 222 (PLC)

GUL MARJANI Versus PAKISTAN MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPO RATION

Jurisdiction / Court
National Industrial Relations Commission
Decided Date
Case No. 18(29) of 1978, decided on 31st July 1978.
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1979 PLP 222 (PLC)
Forum / Court National Industrial Relations Commission
Bench Members N/A
Parties GUL MARJANI Versus PAKISTAN MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPO RATION
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1979 PLP 222 (PLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1979 PLP 222 (PLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the National Industrial Relations Commission bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1979 PLP 222 (PLC) (GUL MARJANI Versus PAKISTAN MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPO RATION). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Sadiq Muhammad Waraich for Petitioner.
  • Khawaja Muhammad Farooq for Respondent.

Headnotes / Summary

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, (VI of 1968)‑ ‑‑ S. O. 15(4)‑Dismissal for misconduct‑Findings of domestic enquiry not supplied to accused with second show‑cause noticeAccused, in circumstances, held, deprived of absolute rightFresh enquiry, held, necessary‑‑Case remanded for fresh enquiry after re‑instatement‑[P L D 1977 Kar. 37 and 1977 S C M R 213 held Lot applicable]. 1975 S C M R 46 distinguished. P L D 1977 Kar. 37 and 1977 S C M R 213 held not applicable. 1973 S C M R 455 ; P L D 1972 Lah. 699 ; P L D 1976 Lah. 209 and 1976 P L C 38 rel.

Judgment & Decree

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, (VI of 1968)‑ ‑‑ S. O. 15(4)‑Dismissal for misconduct‑Findings of domestic enquiry not supplied to accused with second show‑cause noticeAccused, in circumstances, held, deprived of absolute rightFresh enquiry, held, necessary‑‑Case remanded for fresh enquiry after re‑instatement‑[P L D 1977 Kar. 37 and 1977 S C M R 213 held Lot applicable]. 1975 S C M R 46 distinguished. P L D 1977 Kar. 37 and 1977 S C M R 213 held not applicable. 1973 S C M R 455 ; P L D 1972 Lah. 699 ; P L D 1976 Lah. 209 and 1976 P L C 38 rel. Sadiq Muhammad Waraich for Petitioner. Khawaja Muhammad Farooq for Respondent.